Hi Reader,

This week, the two largest school districts in the country, New York City and Los Angeles, both announced generative AI bans for their students. If you’ve only seen the headlines, here’s what’s actually in the policies, and the part I think matters most for parents.

What NYC is doing: Student-facing generative AI is paused for a year in grades K–8 — about 600,000 kids. Companion chatbots (think Character.AI-style tools) are banned outright, in every grade, no exceptions. High schoolers get access to five vetted tools under close teacher supervision and nothing more. Assistive tech for kids with disabilities and multilingual learner supports are still allowed, and teachers can keep using AI for lesson planning.

What LA is doing: LAUSD went further in one way: it banned generative AI on district devices for every grade level, including the high schoolers who previously had access once they’d completed a digital citizenship course. That exception is gone for now, while the district reviews safeguards.

So what are they actually doing with the year? Neither district is treating this as a permanent verdict on AI in education. Instead, they are pressing pause on AI until they learn more about how it impacts students. NYC has convened a Technology in Schools Coalition to study the real-world impact of AI in classrooms and publish recommendations before the moratorium lifts. LAUSD’s school board has a Generative AI Ad Hoc Committee doing the same, due to report back by the end of the 2026–27 school year. In plain terms: both districts are admitting they rolled AI tools out faster than they understood the risks, and they’re using this year to build the policy they should have had from the start (things like age-appropriate use guidelines, data privacy protections, and training for teachers.)

Why it matters, even if your kid isn’t in either district: These two districts educate over a million kids between them, and their actions will likely be a template that other districts will copy.

But here’s the gap a school policy can’t close: this only governs school accounts and school devices. It says nothing about the phone in your kid’s backpack. And nearly 3 in 4 teens have already used an AI companion. A school banning ChatGPT on a Chromebook is a good first step. But, it isn't the whole ballgame.

So if there’s one thing to take from this, it’s not “great, problem solved.” It’s that the conversation about how your kid uses AI, especially companion-style chatbots, falls almost entirely to you right now, at home. Different districts are taking different approaches, but in general, it's best to take ownership over your kid's AI education.

On a personal note: I’m joining our school district’s AI committee to help make sure the decisions being made are centered on child development. The first meeting is tomorrow. I'll fill you in on how it goes. In the meantime, I’m curious: do you know what your school or district’s AI policy actually says?

In Partnership,

Dr. Rupa

P.S. There has been a lot of news about how kids should and shouldn't be using technology lately. While the policy and legal progress is amazing, the takeaway is that we still need to prepare our children for the digital world at home. That's exactly what Tech Ready is built for...practical, research-backed guidance for talking to your kids about these issues at an age-appropriate pace, without waiting for a school committee to catch up.

https://preview.kit-mail3.com/unsubscribe